药物经济学评价中采用映射法获取健康效用值的文献计量研究
x

请在关注微信后,向客服人员索取文件

篇名: 药物经济学评价中采用映射法获取健康效用值的文献计量研究
TITLE: Bibliometric Study on Health Utility Value Obtained by Mapping Method in Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation
摘要: 目的:了解药物经济学评价中采用映射法获取健康效用值的研究现状,为药物经济学评价中映射研究的开展提供参考。方法:以“映射法”“健康效用值”“成本-效用”“效用积分体系”“Mapping”“Healthutilityvalue”“Cost-utility”“Utivitypointsystem”“Valueset”为中英文关键词检索中国知网、万方数据库、PubMed、Medline、Ebsco、Ovid、Wiley数据库中自建库起至2018年12月31日发表的有关映射法获取健康效用值的实证类期刊文献,采用文献计量法对纳入文献的基本信息、模型的构建与检验、最佳模型的类型等内容进行统计分析。结果:纳入研究的124篇文献均发表在英文期刊;在映射模型的构建与检验中,应用频次最多的计量经济学方法、性能评价指标和模型检验方法分别是普通最小二乘法(OLS)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和残差正态性检验,应用频次分别为97次(31.60%)、89次(24.93%)和62次(21.09%);明确最佳映射模型的有117篇,其中,直接映射效果最佳的有101篇(86.32%),非效用量表中大多采用的是特异性量表(92篇,77.97%),少数文献采用了普适性量表(26篇,22.03%),而效用量表采用最多的则是3水平欧洲5维健康量表(79篇,66.95%)。结论:国内采用映射法获取健康效用值的实证类研究还有待发展。国外学者成功开发的一系列映射模型不仅为采用非效用量表进行成本-效用分析提供了可行性,也为我国在今后的映射法实证研究中选用相应的计量经济学方法、评价指标及映射方式等提供了更多的思路。
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To know about the research status of health utility value obtained by mapping method in pharmacoeconomic evaluation ,and to provide reference for bibliometric study in pharmacoeconomic evaluation . METHODS : Using“Mapping method ”“Health utility value ”“Cost-utility”“Utility point system ”as Chinese and English keywords ,retrieved from CNKI ,Wanfang database ,PubMed,Medline,Ebsco,Ovid and Wiley database ,empirical journal documents published from the inception to Dec. 31st,2018 about using mapping method to obtain health utility value were collected. The bibliometrics was used to statistically analyze basic information of included literature ,the construction and test of the model ,the type of the best model and so on. RESULTS :The 124 included documents were all published in English journal. In the construction and testing of the mapping model ,the most frequently used econometric methods ,performance evaluation indicators and model testing methods were ordinary least squares (OLS),mean absolute error (MAE)and residual normality test ,application frequency of which were 97 times(31.60%),89 times(24.93%)and 62 times(21.09%). There are 117 articles that define the best mapping model ,of which 101 articles(86.32%)have the best direct mapping effect. Most of the non-utility measurement scales adopted specific scales (92 articles,77.97%),and a few literatures adopted the universal scale (26 articles,22.03%). The most utility measurement scales were 3-level European 5-dimensional health scale (79 articles,66.95%). CONCLUSIONS :The domestic empirical researches that use the mapping method to obtain health utility values need to be developed yet. A series of mapping models successfully developed by foreign scholars not only provide the feasibility of using non-utility measurement scales for cost-utility analysis ,but also provide more ideas for China to choose the corresponding econometric methods ,evaluation indicators and mapping methods in the empirical research of the mapping method in the future.
期刊: 2020年第31卷第11期
作者: 李梦楠,伍红艳,苟琴,蔡一凡,肖熠,张堂钦,宋沈超,黄艳,谢卓君,林枭
AUTHORS: LI Mengnan,WU Hongyan, GOU Qin,CAI Yifan,XIAO Yi,ZHANG Tangqin,SONG Shenchao,HUANG Yan,XIE Zhuojun,LIN Xiao
关键字: 映射法;健康效用值;成本-效用;量表;药物经济学评价;文献计量研究
KEYWORDS: Mapping method ;Health-utility value ;Cost-utility;Scale;Pharmacoeconomic evaluation ;Bibliometric study
阅读数: 98 次
本月下载数: 5 次

* 注:未经本站明确许可,任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作!