匹伐他汀对比阿托伐他汀治疗中国成人原发性高脂血症的Meta分析
x

请在关注微信后,向客服人员索取文件

篇名: 匹伐他汀对比阿托伐他汀治疗中国成人原发性高脂血症的Meta分析
TITLE:
摘要: 目的:系统评价匹伐他汀对比阿托伐他汀治疗中国成人原发性高脂血症的疗效及安全性,为临床提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索The Cochrane Library、PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库,人工检索Google Scholar、百度学术等搜索引擎,收集匹伐他汀(试验组)对比阿托伐他汀(对照组)治疗中国成人原发性高脂血症的随机对照试验(RCT),筛选文献、提取资料并采用改良Jadad量表评价纳入研究的质量后,采用Rev Man 5.3统计软件对两组患者的总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、三酰甘油(TG)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)的变化水平、有效率及不良反应发生率等指标进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入5项RCT,共456例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者TC降低水平[MD=0.09,95%CI(0.01,0.16),P=0.03]高于对照组,HDL-C升高水平[MD=0.08,95%CI(0.01,0.14),P=0.03]、TG降低水平[MD=-0.13,95%CI(-0.20,-0.06),P=0.000 4]低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义。两组患者LDL-C降低水平[MD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.13,0.10),P=0.84]、有效率[OR=0.75,95%CI(0.15,3.66),P=0.72]、不良反应发生率[OR=0.68,95%CI(0.44,1.05),P=0.08]比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:匹伐他汀降低TC 的疗效较好,降低LDL-C的疗效与阿托伐他汀相当,降低TG及升高HDL-C的疗效劣于阿托伐他汀。但两药安全性相当。
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety of pitavastatin comparison of atorvastatin in the treatment of primary hyperlipemia in Chinese adults, and to provide evidence-based reference for clinic. METHODS: Retrieved from The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Wanfang database, and manually search Google Scholar, Baidu academic search engine, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about pitavastatin (trial group) vs. atorvastatin (control group) in the treatment of primary hyperlipemia in Chinese adults were collected. After literature screening, data extraction, quality evaluation of included studies with modified Jadad scale, Meta-analysis of the levels of total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), response rate and the incidence of ADR was conducted by using Rev Man 5.3 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 5 RCTs were included, involving 456 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed that the decrease of TC level [MD=0.09, 95%CI(0.01, 0.16),P=0.03] in trial group was more better than control group, while the increase of HDL-C level [MD=0.08, 95%CI(0.01, 0.14),P=0.03] and the     decrease of the TG level [MD=-0.13,95%CI(-0.20,       -0.06),P=0.000 4] in trial group were worse than control group, with statistical significance. There was no statistical difference in the decrease of LDL-C[MD=-0.01, 95%CI     (-0.13, 0.10),P=0.84], response rate [OR=0.75, 95%CI(0.15, 3.66),P=0.72] or the incidence of ADR [OR=0.68, 95%CI(0.44, 1.05),P=0.08] between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pitavastatin has better therapeutic efficacy in decreasing TC, but its therapeutic efficacy in decreasing LDL-C is similar to that of atorvastatin; its therapeutic efficacy in decreasing TG and increasing HDL-C is worse than that of atorvastatin. The safety of them is equivalent.
期刊: 2018年第29卷第1期
作者: 徐嘏毅,张博,孙凯,台红祥,黄晓晨,陈似俊,温克,张丽志,宋宝玲
AUTHORS: XU Jiayi,ZHANG Bo,SUN Kai,TAI Hongxiang,HUANG Xiaochen,CHEN Sijun,WEN Ke,ZHANG Lizhi,SONG Baoling
关键字: 匹伐他汀;阿托伐他汀;原发性;高脂血症;Meta分析
KEYWORDS: Pitavastatin; Atorvastatin; Primary; Hyperlipemia; Meta-analysis
阅读数: 696 次
本月下载数: 28 次

* 注:未经本站明确许可,任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作!