基于网状Meta分析与成本-效用分析的缺血性卒中静脉溶栓方案综合评价
x

请在关注微信后,向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名: | 基于网状Meta分析与成本-效用分析的缺血性卒中静脉溶栓方案综合评价 |
| TITLE: | Comprehensive evaluation of intravenous thrombolysis regimens for ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis and cost-utility analysis |
| 摘要: | 目的 评价4种静脉溶栓药物[阿替普酶(rt-PA)、替奈普酶(TNK)、瑞替普酶(rPA)、重组人尿激酶原(rhPro-UK)]多剂量方案治疗缺血性卒中的有效性、安全性和经济性差异。方法检索上述药物用于缺血性卒中静脉溶栓的随机对照试验(RCT),通过网状Meta分析(NMA)比较不同方案的疗效与安全性,并构建Markov模型、从中国卫生体系角度评价其经济性。结果共纳入20项RCT,涉及10种方案。NMA显示,18mg+18mgrPA方案(18mgrPA静脉推注2次)在优秀功能结局上优于TNK各剂量组(0.1、0.25、0.4mg/kg)、rt-PA各剂量组(0.6、0.9mg/kg)及35mgrhPro-UK方案;0.25mg/kgTNK方案优于0.6、0.9mg/kgrt-PA方案。在良好功能结局方面,18mg+18mgrPA方案优于0.25、0.4mg/kgTNK,0.6、0.9mg/kgrt-PA及35mgrhPro-UK方案;0.25mg/kgTNK方案优于0.4mg/kgTNK方案。18mg+18mgrPA方案的不良功能结局发生率最低。在避免极差功能结局方面,0.6mg/kgrt-PA方案最佳,0.4mg/kgTNK方案最差。在安全性方面,35mgrhPro-UK方案的症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率显著低于12mg+12mgrPA(12mgrPA静脉推注2次)和0.4mg/kgTNK方案;0.25mg/kgTNK和0.6、0.9mg/kgrt-PA方案的sICH发生率均显著低于0.4mg/kgTNK方案,且0.6mg/kgrt-PA方案优于0.9mg/kgrt-PA方案。成本-效用分析结果显示,以2倍2025年全国人均国内生产总值为意愿支付阈值,18mg+18mgrPA方案最具经济性优势;敏感性分析结果证明基础分析结果稳健;两项情境分析中,该方案具有经济性的概率均为100%。结论10种缺血性卒中静脉溶栓方案中,18mg+18mgrPA是兼备疗效与经济性的最优方案;35mgrhPro-UK方案可能是高出血风险患者的优选。 |
| ABSTRACT: | OBJECTIVE To evaluate the differences in efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness among multiple dosing regimens of four intravenous thrombolytic agents [alteplase (rt-PA), tenecteplase (TNK), reteplase (rPA), and recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK)] in the treatment of ischemic stroke.METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the above agents for intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke were searched. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different regimens, and a Markov model was constructed to evaluate cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.RESULTS Twenty RCTs involving 10 regimens were included. NMA showed that the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen (two intravenous boluses of 18 mg rPA) was superior to all TNK regimens (0.1, 0.25, and 0.4 mg/kg), all rt-PA regimens (0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg), and the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen in terms of excellent functional outcome; the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen was superior to the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens. In terms of good functional outcome, the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen was superior to the 0.25 and 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimens, the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens, and the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen; the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen was superior to the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen. The 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen had the lowest incidence of poor functional outcome. In terms of avoiding extremely poor functional outcomes, the 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA regimen was the best, and the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen was the worst. In terms of safety, the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) with the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen was significantly lower than that with the 12 mg+12 mg rPA regimen (two intravenous boluses of 12 mg rPA) and the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen; the sICH incidences with the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen and the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens were significantly lower than that with the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen, and the 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA regimen was superior to the 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimen. Cost-utility analysis showed that, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of twice the 2025 national per capita gross domestic product, the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen had the greatest cost-effectiveness advantage; sensitivity analysis confirmed that the base-case results were robust; in both scenario analyses, the probability that this regimen was cost-effective was 100%.CONCLUSIONS Among the 10 intravenous thrombolysis regimens for ischemic stroke, the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen was the optimal regimen combining efficacy and cost-effectiveness; the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen may be the preferred option for patients at high bleeding risk. |
| 期刊: | 2026年第37卷第19期 |
| 作者: | 叶国超;刘帅;陈永邦;孙誉;唐柚青 |
| AUTHORS: | YE Guochao,LIU Shuai,CHEN Yongbang,SUN Yu,TANG Youqing |
| 关键字: | 缺血性卒中;静脉溶栓;阿替普酶;替奈普酶;瑞替普酶;重组人尿激酶原;网状Meta分析;药物经济学 |
| KEYWORDS: | Ischemic stroke;Intravenous thrombolysis;Alteplase;tenecteplase;Reteplase;recombinant human prourokinase;Network Meta-analysis;Pharmacoeconomics |
| 阅读数: | 3 次 |
| 本月下载数: | 0 次 |
* 注:未经本站明确许可,任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作!
返回
加入收藏










