替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林抗血小板方案在高危非致残性缺血性脑血管事件中的应用
x

请在关注微信后,向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名: | 替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林抗血小板方案在高危非致残性缺血性脑血管事件中的应用 |
| TITLE: | Application of ticagrelor combined with aspirin antiplatelet therapy in high-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebro-vascular events |
| 摘要: | 目的 探索替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林抗血小板方案在高危非致残性缺血性脑血管事件(HR-NICE)中的应用效果。方法回顾性选择2023年1月1日至2025年1月1日于南阳医学高等专科学校第一附属医院就诊的232例HR-NICE患者为研究对象,根据不同的抗血小板治疗方案将其分为3组:A组(78例)采用氯吡格雷首日300mg负荷后再以75mg,qd联合阿司匹林100mg,qd;B组(69例)采用替格瑞洛首日120mg负荷后再以60mg,bid联合阿司匹林100mg,qd;C组(85例)采用替格瑞洛首日180mg负荷后再以90mg,bid联合阿司匹林100mg,qd;各组双联抗血小板治疗21d后改为阿司匹林单药维持。比较3组患者的主要观察结局[早期神经功能恶化(END)发生率]和次要观察结局(出院后90d内缺血性事件发生率、30/90d预后良好的比例、90d内出血事件发生率)。采用Logistic回归模型分析不同抗血小板治疗方案与END发生风险之间的关系,并进一步纳入治疗方案与人口学及临床基线特征的交互项,分析不同亚组患者中治疗方案与END发生风险之间的交互效应。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行稳健性分析验证。结果在主要观察结局上,C组患者的END发生率明显低于A组(P<0.05);在次要观察结局上,3组患者出院后90d内缺血性事件发生率、30/90d预后良好的比例比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组和C组患者轻度出血事件的发生率明显高于A组(P<0.05);3组患者在中度和严重出血事件的发生率上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。交互效应分析结果显示,缺血性脑血管病、年龄-血压-临床症状-症状持续时间-糖尿病评分(ABCD2)、REACH风险评分及埃森卒中评分(ESSEN)与治疗方案之间存在显著交互作用(P<0.05);在合并缺血性脑血管病以及ABCD2≥6分、REACH风险评分≥6分、ESSEN≥3分的患者中,B组或C组方案相较于A组方案与更低的END发生风险相关。PSM分析结果与匹配前分析方向基本一致。结论替格瑞洛(尤其是90mg,bid)联合阿司匹林方案与HR-NICE患者较低的END发生风险相关,但会增加轻度出血事件发生风险。合并缺血性脑血管病及具有较高ABCD2、REACH风险评分、ESSEN的患者可能为该联合方案的潜在获益人群。 |
| ABSTRACT: | OBJECTIVE To explore the application effect of ticagrelor combined with aspirin antiplatelet therapy in high-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events (HR-NICE). METHODS A total of 232 patients with HR-NICE treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College from January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2025 were retrospectively selected. According to different antiplatelet regimens, the patients were divided into three groups: group A (78 cases) received clopidogrel 300 mg as a loading dose on the first day, followed by clopidogrel 75 mg, qd combined with aspirin 100 mg, qd; group B (69 cases) received ticagrelor 120 mg as a loading dose on the first day, followed by ticagrelor 60 mg, bid combined with aspirin 100 mg, qd; group C (85 cases) received ticagrelor 180 mg as a loading dose on the first day, followed by ticagrelor 90 mg, bid combined with aspirin 100 mg, qd. All groups received dual-antiplatelet therapy for 21 days and were then switched to aspirin monotherapy. The primary outcome [incidence of early neurological deterioration (END)] and secondary outcomes, including incidence of ischemic events within 90 days post-discharge, favorable prognosis at 30/90 days, and incidence of bleeding events within 90 days, were compared among the three groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between different antiplatelet regimens and END. Interaction terms between treatment regimen and demographic and clinical baseline characteristics were further included to evaluate the interaction effect between treatment regimen and END risk in different subgroups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS For the primary outcome, the incidence of END in group C was significantly lower than that in group A ( P <0.05). For secondary outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the incidence of ischemic events within 90 days post-discharge, favorable prognosis at 30/90 days ( P >0.05). The incidence of minor bleeding events in groups B and C was significantly higher than that in group A ( P <0.05), while no significant differences were observed among the three groups in moderate or severe bleeding events ( P >0.05). Interaction analysis showed that ischemic cerebrovascular disease, Age-Blood Pressure-Clinical Feature-Duration-Diabetes Score (ABCD2), REACH risk score, and Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESSEN) had significant interactions with treatment regimen ( P <0.05). Among patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease, ABCD2≥6 points, REACH risk score≥6 points, or ESSEN≥3 points, regimens B or C were associated with a lower risk of END compared with regimen A. The PSM results were generally consistent with the analysis before matching. CONCLUSIONS Ticagrelor, especially the 90 mg bid regimen, plus aspirin, was associated with a lower risk of END in patients with HR-NICE, but increased the risk of minor bleeding events. Patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease and higher ABCD2, REACH risk score, or ESSEN may be potential beneficiaries of this combination regimen. |
| 期刊: | 2026年第37卷第11期 |
| 作者: | 王力闯;苏蕊雅;江康 |
| AUTHORS: | WANG Lichuang,SU Ruiya,JIANG Kang |
| 关键字: | 替格瑞洛; 阿司匹林; 高危非致残性缺血性脑血管事件; 双联抗血小板治疗; 早期神经功能恶化 |
| KEYWORDS: | ticagrelor; aspirin; high-risk non-disabling ischemic cerebrovascular events; dual-antiplatelet therapy; early neurological deterioration |
| 阅读数: | 2 次 |
| 本月下载数: | 0 次 |
* 注:未经本站明确许可,任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作!
返回
加入收藏










