返回 
加入收藏
药品说明书外用法中国专家共识中的证据和推荐意见评价方法研究
x
请在关注微信后，向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名： | 药品说明书外用法中国专家共识中的证据和推荐意见评价方法研究 |
| TITLE： | Study of the evaluation methods for evidence and recommendation in Chinese expert consensus on off-label use of drugs |
| 摘要： | 目的 为优化或制定统一的药品说明书外用法专家共识的证据和推荐意见评价方法提供参考。方法检索中国知网、万方数据、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed和WebofScience，纳入各数据库自建库起至2024年8月1日收录的包含证据和推荐意见评价方法的药品说明书外用法中国专家共识，筛选文献并提取资料后进行描述性统计分析。结果与结论最终纳入32篇文献，14篇（43.8%）采用Micromedex的Thomson分级系统，形成推荐意见时仅有7篇（21.9%）考虑了经济性，10篇（31.3%）报告了利益冲突情况，仅2篇（6.3%）有循证医学方法学专家的参与。不同专家共识评价方法中证据来源类型、形成推荐意见时考量的因素、证据和推荐意见分级标准有差异，同一用法在不同专家共识中的证据等级和推荐意见也有差异。建议未来制定共识时应提高对参与共识人员利益冲突的关注度，加强与方法学专家的合作，并尽快制定统一的证据和推荐意见评价方法标准。 |
| ABSTRACT： | OBJECTIVE To provide reference for optimizing or formulating unified evaluation methods for evidence and recommendation in expert consensus on off-label use of drugs. METHODS Retrieved from CNKI， Wanfang data， VIP， CBM， PubMed and Web of Science， Chinese expert consensuses on off-label use of drugs involving evaluation methods for evidence and recommendations were collected from the inception to August 1， 2024. After screening the literature and extracting relevant data， descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS Among the 32 articles included， 14 articles （43.8%） used Micromedex’s Thomson grading system， only 7 articles （21.9%） considered economic factors when forming recommendations， 10 articles （31.3%） reported the conflicts of interest； only 2 articles （6.3%） involved experts in the field of evidence-based medicine methodology. There were differences in the sources of evidence， factors considered in forming recommendations， and the grading standards for evidence and recommendations among different expert consensus evidence evaluation methods. There were also differences in evidence levels and recommendation strength of the same drug off-label use in different expert consensus. It is recommended that in future consensus-building processes， greater attention should be paid to potential conflicts of interest among participants， collaboration with methodological experts should be enhanced， and efforts should be expedited to establish unified standards for evaluating evidence and recommendation methodologies. |
| 期刊： | 2025年第36卷第06期 |
| 作者： | 张明月；陈楠；徐玲；拜争刚；林丽开 |
| AUTHORS： | ZHANG Mingyue，CHEN Nan，XU Ling，BAI Zhenggang，LIN Likai |
| 关键字： | 药品说明书外用法；证据；推荐意见；专家共识 |
| KEYWORDS： | off-label use of drugs； evidence； recommen- |
| 阅读数： | 3 次 |
| 本月下载数： | 0 次 |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！
