《多维度多准则中成药综合评价技术指导原则》解读:评价指标权重
x

请在关注微信后,向客服人员索取文件

篇名: 《多维度多准则中成药综合评价技术指导原则》解读:评价指标权重
TITLE: Interpretation of the Guideline for Multi-dimensional and Multi-criteria Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Patent Medicine:weighting of evaluation indicators
摘要: 目的 对《多维度多准则中成药综合评价技术指导原则》中“多维度多准则中成药综合评价技术指标体系(第一版)”的权重确定方法与结果进行详细报道和解读。方法根据层次分析法及专家赋值权重法所计算出的综合权重值进行归一化运算,获取指标的客观权重。结果当前中成药综合评价指标体系6个一级维度权重结果显示,其权重排序为有效维度>安全维度>标准维度>应用维度>科学维度>经济维度,权重值分别为0.2810、0.2685、0.1958、0.1073、0.0961、0.0513,与当前大多数研究结果一致。结论本指标体系权重确定过程科学合理、方法明确、解读清晰,值得进一步优化研究和广泛应用。
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE To provide a detailed report and interpretation of the method and results for determining the weights of the technical indicators from the “multi-dimensional and multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation index system (first edition)” stated in Guideline for Multi-dimensional and Multi-criteria Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Patent Medicine. METHODS Normalization calculations were performed on the comprehensive weight values calculated by the analytic hierarchy process and expert weighting method to obtain the objective weights of the indicators. RESULTS The weight results of the six primary dimensions in the current comprehensive evaluation indicator system of Chinese patent medicine showed effectiveness dimension> safety dimension>standard dimension>application dimension>scientific dimension>economic dimension, with weight values of 0.281 0, 0.268 5, 0.195 8, 0.107 3, 0.096 1 and 0.051 3 respectively, consistent with the results of most researches currently. CONCLUSIONS The process of weight determination in this indicator system is scientifically reasonable, with clear methods and clear interpretations, and is worthy of further optimization and widespread application.
期刊: 2024年第35卷第07期
作者: 张海力;刘 斌;王巍力;曹文杰;杨一玖;胡紫腾;陈雅馨;梁宁;李慧珍;车前子;宗星煜;陈昭;王燕平;史楠楠
AUTHORS: ZHANG Haili,LIU Bin,WANG Weili,CAO Wenjie,YANG Yijiu,HU Ziteng, CHEN Yaxin,LIANG Ning,LI Huizhen,CHE Qianzi,ZONG Xingyu,CHEN Zhao,WANG Yanping,SHI Nannan
关键字: 中成药;综合评价;层次分析法;专家赋值权重法
KEYWORDS: Chinese patent medicine; comprehensive evaluation; analytic hierarchy process; expert weighting method
阅读数: 52 次
本月下载数: 4 次

* 注:未经本站明确许可,任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作!