返回 
加入收藏
依托咪酯与七氟烷分别复合骶管或硬膜外阻滞麻醉对患儿麻醉效果及炎症因子的影响
x
请在关注微信后，向客服人员索取文件
| 篇名： | 依托咪酯与七氟烷分别复合骶管或硬膜外阻滞麻醉对患儿麻醉效果及炎症因子的影响 |
| TITLE： | |
| 摘要： | 目的：探讨依托咪酯与七氟烷分别联合骶管或硬膜外阻滞麻醉对患儿麻醉效果、炎症因子的影响及安全性。方法：选取我院2012年2月－2015年12月收治的拟行手术治疗的患儿160例，按随机数字表法分为A、B组，各80例。A组患儿给予依托咪酯注射液3 mg/（kg·h）维持麻醉+骶管或硬膜外阻滞；B组患儿给予七氟烷吸入1％～3％维持麻醉+骶管或硬膜外阻滞。比较两组患儿麻醉效果及手术前后血清S100β蛋白（S100β） 、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、β淀粉酶（Aβ）和炎症因子水平，并观察不良反应发生情况。结果：两组患儿手术前后血氧饱和度（SpO2）比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；A组患儿麻醉诱导时间、术后苏醒时间、心率均长于或高于B组，差异有统计学意义 （P＜0.05）。术前，两组患儿血清S100β、NSE、Aβ及炎症因子水平比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后，两组患儿血清S100β、NSE、Aβ及CRP、白细胞介素（IL）-2、IL-6水平均明显升高，且A组明显高于B组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；肿瘤坏死因子α（TNF-α）手术前后及组间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。两组患儿均未见明显不良反应发生。结论：七氟烷复合骶管或硬膜外阻滞麻醉效果明显优于依托咪酯复合麻醉，且炎症反应较轻、安全性较好。 |
| ABSTRACT： | OBJECTIVE： To investigate the influence and safety of etomidate or sevoflurane combined with sacral or epidural block anesthesia on anesthesia effects and inflammatory factors. METHODS： 160 children undergoing surgery selected from our hospital during Feb. 2012 to Dec. 2015 were divided into group A and B according to random number table， with 80 cases in each group. Group A was given etomidate 3 mg/（kg·h）for anesthesia maintenance+sacral or epidural block； group B received sevoflurane inhalation 1％-3％ for anesthesia maintenance+sacral or epidural block. The anesthesia effects were compared between 2 groups as well as the levels of serum S100β， NSE， Aβ and inflammatory factors before and after surgery. The occurrence of ADR was observed. RESULTS： There was no statistical significance in SpO2 between 2 groups before and after surgery （P＞0.05）. The anesthesia induction time， postoperative recovery time and heart rate of group A were significantly longer or higher than those of group B， with statistical significance （P＜0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the levels of serum S100β， NSE， Aβ and inflammatory factors between 2 groups before surgery （P＞0.05）. After surgery， the levels of serum S100β， NSE， Aβ， CRP， IL-2 and IL-6 were significantly increased in 2 groups， and group A was significantly higher than group B， with statistical significance （P＜0.05）； there was no statistical significance in TNF-α before and after surgery or between 2 groups （P＞0.05）. No obvious ADR was found in 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS： Sevoflurane combined with sacral or epidural block anesthesia is better than etomidate combin ation anesthesia， with in mild inflammatory reaction and good safety. |
| 期刊： | 2017年第28卷第11期 |
| 作者： | 高宇，赵展琦，赵晶 |
| AUTHORS： | GAO Yu，ZHAO Zhangqi，ZHAO Jing |
| 关键字： | 依托咪酯；七氟烷；静脉麻醉；吸入麻醉；炎症反应 |
| KEYWORDS： | Etomidate； Sevoflurane； Intravenous anesthesia； Inhalation anesthesia； Inflammatory reaction |
| 阅读数： | 243 次 |
| 本月下载数： | 4 次 |
* 注：未经本站明确许可，任何网站不得非法盗链资源下载连接及抄袭本站原创内容资源!在此感谢您的支持与合作！
